Showing posts with label science fiction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label science fiction. Show all posts

Wednesday, 10 October 2012

Wells Wells Wells


It started with The Time Machine, which I downloaded as an iBook. Shamefully, I realised that I hadn't really read any of HG Wells' prodigious and tremendous output, fixed firmly as they are in the imagination of Great Britain and the world, along with Gulliver, Robinson Crusoe and a Bear of Very Little Brain. So I thought I would give The Time Machine a go, expecting perhaps a boy's own adventure story. Sort of familiar with the Morlocks and Eloi and (truthfully) very little else in the tale, I was pleasantly surprised by the poetic, metaphysical course chosen by Wells in his imagining of our Restaurant at the End of the Universe, and - like all good books - it sparked off more questions than answers when I had finished it.

So it was on to War of The Worlds. Yet another story we believe we know so well, but which again I had never read, though of course it lurks in the memory from the days of BBC2 horror movies, the recent (I'm sure) dreadful film with Tom Cruise, and the Orson Welles radio thing. This book is a thrilling, rollicking romp, sweeping from Crawley on through the entire universe and taking in politics and philosophy along with the requisite adventure and science. I found the soldier particularly fascinating, with his revolutionary ideas and his expositions on the frailty of the human character, while the poignant isolation of the narrator after the affair struck a chord for a man like myself about to enter his sixth decade. Great stuff.


By now I had been bitten by the Wells bug, and moved swiftly on to The Invisible Man - another tale so deeply ingrained in our consciousness that there was even a TV series made out of it with David McCallum, and yet the original tale was unknown to me. It is a remarkable read, betraying perhaps its embryonic episodic release in pamphlet form with noticeably abrupt (though ultimately, this adds to the power of the work, rather than diminishing it, as if the very shock of the changes deepens the experience) switches of style: from slapstick humour to shocking violence, to melancholy philosophical treatise. The laughs are real laughs, the violence truly violent, and the philosophy deep and meaningful. All of this told in short, breathless chapters which drive the action relentlessly on, page by page by page. The ending intensely evokes a sense of sombre thoughtfulness - musings on our place in a cold, lonely and infinite universe. Not to mention of course the place of the Invisible Man in City's pantheon of fabulous chants.


The Invisible Man led me to read a little about the author himself, and I was then even more intrigued. It's worth looking up his Wikipedia page to find out more, but he led an extraordinary private life alongside his enormous written output, and was a visionary socialist thinker (I know, I know. Everyone was racist then. And a eugenicist) in tandem with his visionary scientific explorations. So it was that I visited the library, and there took out The Island of Dr Moreau, maybe not quite as fixed in the imagination as the Time Machine, War of The Worlds or The Invisible Man, yet still famous enough I guess, and certainly very well known by fans of science fiction. This was a venture even deeper into the mysteries of human existence, a treatise on god and man and civilisation set - in the best Defoe/Stephenson tradition - on a remote Pacific island. A superb work, where the reader feels transformed almost as much as the narrator by the end, and where surely Maurice Sendak took much of his inspiration for Where The Wild Things Are. The creatures and themes of the book still echo in my mind, some two weeks after finishing it.

My next (and current) book of Wells is The Shape Of Things to Come, which is so far the least familiar of any I've yet read, though it is not obscure, and I remember some pastiches or adverts from years ago. It is, up to the point I've reached so far, a real exploration of history, of the insanity of the economic model, clearly influenced strongly by the horrors of the Great War, and the need to create something meaningful and optimistic out of the carnage of 1914-18. There is a telling swipe at Winston Churchill:

"He displays a vigorous naive puerility that still gives his story an atoning charm. He has the insensitiveness of a child of thirteen. His soldiers are toy soldiers and he loves to knock over a whole row of them."

But, more than this, his critique of the Great War, and of the economic circumstances which brought it into being, which nurtured it through the terrible years of conflict and beyond, is searing. There are many parallels with the insanity of our current situation, a lesson from the past pretending to be from the future, which feels as prophetic as if it actually were written many years hence:

"With difficulty will the student let down his mind into the fantastic world of extinct imaginations in which these strange personifications, as monstrous and incredible as the ancient gods of India, were treated as real and morally responsible individuals, hated, trusted, feared and loved. The war was, in immediate fact, an aimless and fruitless slaughter upon the altars of these stupendous deities, the wounding and mutilation of perhaps twenty million human beings, and a vast burning-up of material wealth. In the crazy fancy of our ancestors it was a noble and significant struggle."

Tuesday, 11 September 2012

Taut


Having caught the buzz quite late, I went to see Dredd 3D. It was little short of excellent - as a stand-alone tower block thriller, and as a very loving and faithful attempt at rendering Mega City One - which does (ahem) justice to the creative talents of the creators and the fervent fanaticism of the loyal followers of 2000AD. Perhaps because of the lame attempts at opprobrium by a group of teenagers in the foyer after the film had finished, I now feel even more strongly about the quality of the movie, and sincerely hope that it is the first in a franchise which will bring Mean Machine, Judges Mortis, Fear, Fire and Death - and many others - to the big screen.

Karl Urban plays Dredd exceptionally well, and has the downturned mouth absolutely perfect. Hard as it must be to convey any emotion (though in truth, there is little emotion in Dredd at all) when most of your face is covered, when it's needed, it's there. This limitation is also offset by Anderson (again, immaculately played by Olivia Thirlby) who as it were provides the yin to Urban's yang. Three D photography is utilised brilliantly, with much use of vertiginous straight down shots of the city's tower blocks, and some stunning slo-mo sequences, although all the teens in the foyer could say was: 'They loved their slo-mo, didn't they?' Fuckwits. The slow motion scenes provide a neat visual story arc device, echoing their themes at the beginning and end.


The violence is powerful, though definitely paying homage to the source material and as such the impact slightly lessened through being a little over the top. This is not a criticism, I hasten to add, and the creativity behind some of the shots is absolutely stunning. The soundtrack is as spare and taut as the onscreen action, and drives the film relentlessly forward with hardly a pause for breath. Ezquerra co-wrote, and it was great to see a block with his name on it near the beginning. I also noticed (I think) a belly wheel, near a stranded fatty in one sequence, and some Chopper graffito on one of the walls. It is a British movie, and the cityscape has been described as resembling Tower Hamlets, but I think we see a nice contrast between the ultra high tech equipment and the sordid, miserable everyday lives of the Mega citizens.


I had a slight problem with one huge set piece gun scene, which didn't really live up to the imagination of most of the others. A seemingly endless hail of bullets from several Gatling gun type weapons fails to nail Dredd as he simply runs just ahead of the barrage and then ducks beneath it before asking his Lawgiver for a High Ex shell to escape the trap. Even this was great fun, though, and I wouldn't have missed it for the world. Go and see it, I urge you.

Sunday, 31 October 2010

My life


Thanks to Fanpop for the image.

Having recently finished Arthur C Clarke's 3001: The Final Odyssey, I was contemplating how much memory might be required to store the entirety of a person's existence ready for re-activation at a future date - a la Rimmer out of Red Dwarf.

I recently purchased a very reasonably priced portable hard drive from PC World (£34.95 - 320GB) so that I could back up and take with me my Mac settings and all of my music and pictures. I was amazed (and slightly disappointed) that all of this chaff together took up just over 80GB of space.

Of course, that 80GB total does not contain the totality of me. Without mentioning the music I have  owned in vinyl, magnetic tape or CD form which I have not yet digitised, nor even just heard somewhere (ah, the demise of Limewire... What are we to do?) it doesn't capture the stored verbatim Monty Python sketches, the memorable (and less so) scenes from the many movies I've seen, or the - admittedly few - moments of glory from Manchester City matches (anything from yesterday's match would of course be over-written very quickly). Neither does it hold recordings of the millions of bits of human interaction that have taken place in my life. I think AC Clarke posited about 2 TeraBytes as an estimate of a person's existence, but maybe he was basing that figure on vastly superior data compression technologies than any we currently have access to.

Tuesday, 24 March 2009

Following My Dick

With thanks to Blarg.net for the image. Which was probably stolen anyway...

Reluctant as I am to add to an already enormous pool of erudite comment about a great writer, my current library book is forcing me to say something. By use of the telepathic tendrils it has shot into my nervous system.

Of all the writers (SF or otherwise) I have read, the elusive and effulgent Philip K Dick possesses the rarest of abilities to surprise and confound at almost every sentence's beginning. I have read a great deal of his (and the word prolific doesn't do justice to the canon) work - both Iain and Iain M if you get my drift - and have been in love with most all of it. At the time and in retrospect.

At present, I am three quarters of the way through Flow My Tears The Policeman Said, and it feels (as it often does) that the writing starts to bleed into my life, in the same way that objective reality is always negotiable for the characters in Dick's books. We flit, with increasing unease, from the mundane to the drug-induced and back again, until we seriously begin to question our own sanity. Mostly because we can all too clearly identify with the un-anchored nature of our grip on this lunacy we pretend to be in control of every day. Slowly, we start to slip off, like the strings on Jimi's guitar, and a fight breaks out on the tube, and a lost person calls out too late for directions to Covent Garden...

I think it would be safe to say that Dick dabbled in psychotropic substances during his immensely complex and fruitful life, but was - crucially - able to write about his experiences with such terrifying clarity, humour and savagery. Anyone who has ever taken mushrooms or dropped a tab must squirm in their chair as they read some of the passages.

Now you'll have to excuse me as I have a date with a leather-clad bondage obsessed incestuous 6 foot tall twin sister skeleton who is lying on the bathroom floor. And I'm not sure if the mescaline has worn off. Cheers.